Skip to main content

DISCLOSURES - Cookies

DISCLOSURES


This site uses cookies, mostly through Google's Blogger policy.


Some lawyers stay up at night trying to ruin free society and create new rules. Therefore, here are the disclosures I must have that you probably won't read.

My Thoughts on Abortion, as posted to a Facebook Dialogue.



This was a dialogue I felt I had to weigh in to. It was on a photo posted on Matt Krauses Public Facebook Page. It shows the total ignorance of Abortion Advocates. My response is at the bottom.

Top of Form

Matt Krause
Like This PageLiked · 6 hours ago

Honored to stand with Gov. Perry and other pro-life legislators at today's HB 2 signing. A great day for Texas and its posterity!
Jeff Plaga "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...". You are restricting a woman's right to do as her religion deems acceptable based off of your religious beliefs.
Matt Krause That doesn't endorse the idea of separation of church and state. All that says is that there can be no official state religion. There is no reference in the Constitution that implicates a wall, and our founding father's actions do not support such a p...See More
Jeff Plaga Yes as a Jefferson historian I am very well versed on where the phrase "separation of church and state" originated. But you are restricting someone to perform a perfectly acceptable medical procedure based on your religious beliefs. However, the suprem...See More
Matt Krause With abortion, it is not just a woman and her doctor. There is a third person involved and the government has a duty to ensure that a person's life, liberty, or property is not deprived without due process of law. It is a perfectly legitimate act of th...See More
Jeff Plaga I agree there is a limit as to when a woman should be allowed to have an abortion and the MEDICAL community should be the one making that decision. But why are you restricting access to places that perform abortion? And don't say it is for the safety of women because your leader, Rick Perry, already stated that this bill was designed to ultimately outlaw abortion.
Darrell G. Wolfe Medical:
As the son of an RN who has spent her entire life working with Mom's and Babies in Postpartum and in Delivery let me weigh in here. There some, but very few, instances where an abortion has any medical necessity. It is the governments’ duty to preserve life. It is the duty of all practicing Doctors to preserve life.
Let’s define “abortion” and “early delivery” as two different things.
Abortion often involves cutting and tearing apart the unborn child piece by piece, while living in order to cause violent and painful death to the unborn child.
Early Delivery then would be an alternative. If it becomes medically necessary to deliver early and “terminate” the pregnancy, the alternative, typically not practiced by abortion advocate doctors, would be to deliver the child, natural or C-Section, whole and as alive as it can be and then allow nature to take it’s course. Many children have been born premature and lived much earlier than doctors believed they would. It’s also the job of doctors to preserve life so that newly born child would then require all medically available intervention to prevent it’s death. IF, and only IF, at that point the child dies we can say that it Medicine and Law served their role to protect life.
“Abortion” defined as the purposeful destruction of a living being, has NO medical, moral, or legal case. It should be outlawed in whole at all stages of pregnancy. The child has a brain and heart before most women know their pregnant. “Life: brain waves, heart pumping, and other signs of life” begin early on in the first trimester.
If medical necessity is determined this would require “Early Delivery”, NOT “Abortion”.
Moral:
The Moral debate on this subject is another matter and simply put:
What does any human in the USA have the right to choose? Does a mother have the right to choose to kill her 17 YEAR old son if he causes her inconvenience or she “chooses” to? What moral difference is there between killing a 17 year old and a 17 week old and a 17 hour old? At what point does that human being get rights? Abortion advocates are not fighting FOR women, they are fighting AGAINST children.
Also study after study show that Abortion on the whole has done more harm to women physically and emotionally than it has ever done anyone any good. The Abortion Industry is a multi-billion dollar business and it preys on women at a vulnerable point in their lives and pressures them into making this decision more often than not. Many who try to back out are discouraged from backing out and pressured to continue. Places like Planned Parenthood rarely provide any of the very viable alternatives to Abortion to these women. Those that fight for Abortion are fighting to preserve a business that makes them a lot of money and violates women on many levels. Fighting abortion is a fight FOR women and FOR children.
It is Abortion advocates that hate women and children and use them for their own profits.
One man’s opinion, Darrell G. Wolfe
http://N2GS.Blogspot.Com
n2gs.blogspot.com
A blog written to help people into Good Success in every area of their lives, Spiritual, Physical, and Financial.

Bottom of Form


For those who cannot see the photo:

Medical:
As the son of an RN who has spent her entire life working with Mom's and Babies in Postpartum and in Delivery let me weigh in here. There some, but very few, instances where an abortion has any medical necessity. It is the governments’ duty to preserve life. It is the duty of all practicing Doctors to preserve life.
Let’s define “abortion” and “early delivery” as two different things.
Abortion often involves cutting and tearing apart the unborn child piece by piece, while living in order to cause violent and painful death to the unborn child.
Early Delivery then would be an alternative. If it becomes medically necessary to deliver early and “terminate” the pregnancy, the alternative, typically not practiced by abortion advocate doctors, would be to deliver the child, natural or C-Section, whole and as alive as it can be and then allow nature to take it’s course. Many children have been born premature and lived much earlier than doctors believed they would. It’s also the job of doctors to preserve life so that newly born child would then require all medically available intervention to prevent it’s death. IF, and only IF, at that point the child dies we can say that it Medicine and Law served their role to protect life.
 “Abortion” defined as the purposeful destruction of a living being, has NO medical, moral, or legal case. It should be outlawed in whole at all stages of pregnancy. The child has a brain and heart before most women know their pregnant. “Life: brain waves, heart pumping, and other signs of life” begin early on in the first trimester.
If medical necessity is determined this would require “Early Delivery”, NOT “Abortion”.
Moral:
The Moral debate on this subject is another matter and simply put:  
What does any human in the USA have the right to choose? Does a mother have the right to choose to kill her 17 YEAR old son if he causes her inconvenience or she “chooses” to? What moral difference is there between killing a 17 year old and a 17 week old and a 17 hour old? At what point does that human being get rights? Abortion advocates are not fighting FOR women, they are fighting AGAINST children.
Also study after study show that Abortion on the whole has done more harm to women physically and emotionally than it has ever done anyone any good. The Abortion Industry is a multi-billion dollar business and it preys on women at a vulnerable point in their lives and pressures them into making this decision more often than not. Many who try to back out are discouraged from backing out and pressured to continue. Places like Planned Parenthood rarely provide any of the very viable alternatives to Abortion to these women. Those that fight for Abortion are fighting to preserve a business that makes them a lot of money and violates women on many levels. Fighting abortion is a fight FOR women and FOR children.
It is Abortion advocates that hate women and children and use them for their own profits.
One man’s opinion, Darrell G. Wolfe http://N2GS.Blogspot.Com


Have questions about anything I said here? Want to share your story? Comment Below!

I call you empowered 2 prosper with good success!


N2 Good SuccessDarrell G. Wolfe
Blog: http://n2gs.blogspot.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/n2goodsuccess
Twitter: http://twitter.com/n2goodsuccess

See Also:
Books by Darrell G. Wolfe: Amazon.com/author/darrellgwolfe 
Book Suggestions from the N2 Good Success Amazon Store
Brand and Product Offerings from N2 Good Success Zazzle Store




___


 

Comments

  1. Movements

    Spontaneous movements begin at seven weeks:

    "By 45 days, about the time of the mother's second missed period, the baby's skeleton is complete in cartilage, not bone, at first; ... he makes the first movements of his body and new-grown limbs, although it will be another 12 weeks before his movements are strong enough to be transmitted through the insensitive uterus to be detected by the mother's sensitive abdominal wall."4

    Brain function

    Brain waves have been recorded by EEG (electro- encephalograph) in the human embryo 40 days after fertilisation.

    http://www.spuc.org.uk/education/abortion/human-development#first

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Be Nice, Be Kind, Be Thoughtful, Be Honest, Be Creative...GO!

Reading List








DISCLOSURES

DISCLOSURES

Some lawyers stay up at night trying to ruin free society and create new rules. Therefore, here are the disclosures I must have that you probably won't read.

Sign Up

Consider Supporting This Site: Become a Patron! Sign Up so you don't miss a post:

Special Delivery

* indicates required

View previous campaigns.

Powered by MailChimp

Darrell's Reading List


Here are some books I've been reading lately:
  • Hacker: The Outlaw Chronicles (here) by Ted Dekker (Author). The story of a young Hacker girl, who went on a wild adventure into the supernatural realm beyond trying to save her mom, but saved her self too in the process.
  • Saint: A Paradise Novel (here) by Ted Dekker (Author). He's an assassin, or is he? He finds a secret to his past that unlocks supernatural abilities, at a cost.
  • For a full list of all my book suggestions, see my Amazon Store.

Popular posts from this blog

Church Notes @Gatewaypeople

Church Notes @Gatewaypeople
03/09/2014
Church Survey from 7 years ago.

Overview

1. Exploring God. Attending Church but not saved yet. Fellowship
T-the cross divides here...

2. Beginning in God. Relationship.

3. Close to God. Discipleship.

4. God Centered. Lordship.

Mark 4

Seed fell on four groups.



Levels of Friendship

1. Don't talk
 - Its not works.
 - ?
 - Free Gift .

Grace

2. Became Friends

God's Word

3. Talk Often. Best Friends

Giving


4. Committed into death.





Note*
What if you take what you HATE to do and use it as a chance to do what you LOVE to do???



Foundations Class #2 Levels of Change

Foundations Class #2Levels of ChangeBob HampClass can be seen on GatewayPeople.ComStarts with two stories...1. True Story. He had driven out to help his aunt who had a flat tire. He used a metric lug wrench on an American car, it wouldn't work so he forced it, stripping out all the lugs. He used the wrong tools to try to fix the problem and trying harder made it worse.

2. Potty Training Parable. You have an infant and shortly after you realize that the child needs his/her diaper changed. So you change it and it gets dirty again, and you change it, and it gets dirty again... Constant change but nothing changes. Then you get a higher order of change. Potty training. Once the child is potty trained you no longer have to change the messes anymore. A higher order of change has over-ridden the former things.
It is this type of change we are referring to with "Levels" of change. Not levels as in: When I pass 1st grade I will be in 2nd grade. It's not linear change, progressiv…

The W Story Structure - 4 Sequence Story Structure

Out of everything I've ever read on story structure for fiction writing, the W-Story Structure makes the most sense to me. If you'd rather view these as Acts (3-Act or 4-Act) you can overlay that on this W and it still works.



Glen C. Strathy writes (in much more detail here) in his article, The W-Plot vs. The Dramatica Model of Story Structure. There are four sequences for most stories. Each of the four legs of the W is comprised of a sequence of events that lead the story along to it's natural conclusion.

Sequence 1: setting up the problem (creating tension)Sequence 2: recovering from the problem (new ideas, positive momentum)Sequence 3: deepening of the problemSequence 4: the resolution of the problem (new light or understanding)

Sequence 1: setting up the problem (creating tension)
The Inciting Event (the event that is at the heart of the reason this story happened) may have occurred before your story begins, and often does. In King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017), th…

FINAL PAPER | The Storiented Bible | The Greatest Story Ever Told

The Storiented Bible The Greatest Story Ever Told
FINAL PAPER 

Darrell Wolfe 
BIBL-1300 Introduction to the Bible 
Spring 2019, Online Session 1 
February 27, 2019 


Table of Contents 
Introduction.. 3
We Are Wired for Story.. 3
The Bible Is Story.. 5
Interpreting Our Story in The Story.. 7
Conclusion.. 8

Introduction In the beginning, the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God. (Immerse, 2017) John, page 399 
Notice that John begins his gospel by calling Jesus, The Word. We find Words, and the stories they create for us, impact us at a level that is beyond our cognitive ability to understand in the moment. Being caught up in a story can make you lose all sense of present, and be transported to another time and place (and sometimes another world entirely).

Ever since Aristotle observed that stories had a beginning, a middle, and an end, the science of story has been developed and studied. Our modern sensibilities tell us at a gut level whether a story “works” or i…

Reflection Paper: Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis

Reflections of Mere Christianity
This is a reflection paper of the text Mere Christianity (Lewis, 1952, 1980). The content was first delivered as radio broadcast material between 1942-1944 by Clive Staples “CS” Lewis. Lewis then gathered the materials and published them as three sperate works, later combining and editing the text that became Mere Christianity. With the mind of a scholar and the mouth of a layman, Lewis takes us through the various topics that affect our lives as Christians and provides practical break-downs of how we are to treat each topic, supplemented by a host of modern parallels and parables. He is careful not to take any position that is not laid solidly in the Word of God, leaving those positions that are controversial within the Church either without an opinion or a well-deserved analysis of each side. However, far from a dry treatment of theology, Lewis gives us a laugh through each turn as he cuts through the heady stuff for the “why behind” each discussion…

Archive

Other sites I follow: